She's an economist who worked in the Bush White House, where a lot of others worked. If her choosing to work for George W. Bush in 2000 disqualifies her husband, because you don't like the person she was assigned to work with for one year of her time there, then you have an exceptionally broad definition of "traitor".
My "lawyerly micro-parsing" was intended to show the details of the relationships you implied. The organizations you cited were ones that one of her White House supervisors worked for either before or after she worked for him, not organizations she chose to work for. The exception was one where she disagreed with the part of their conclusions that bothered me. Obviously I failed in communicating that, but at least I shared the facts.
Cruz - and his wife - are running as conservatives. Heidi’s track record is clearly globalist. The strategy of globalism is the destruction of national boundaries through trade agreements. By whatever method, attacking the integrity of US national boundaries with the goal of bringing them down, is treason, and the Americans who pursue such efforts are traitors. Bush turned out to be a major globalist, covered by, as Cruz does, claims of conservatism. These are just plain facts. You want to call them something else, that’s your fantasy, not mine. If Cruz and Heidi and the Bushes had their way, we’d live in the UN sanctioned North American Union, not the United States of America, and our pesky Constitution would be gone once and for all. That’s their goal, and that’s what Heidi worked to help accomplish as an “economist.”