Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lonestar67

You’re the one that implied people should cover their privates with ‘helmets’ to protect them from ‘penetration’ with nonstandard ‘item’s.

Because ‘ealth and safety!’

Or something.

If you’re going to argue ‘implements’ and ‘health and safety’ vis a vis ‘emergency room visits’ and the state’s ability to limit those ‘implements’ in the name of public health, do NOT be surprised when the next ‘implements’ that might cause ‘emergency room visits’ they regulate are your very own firearms.


24 posted on 04/14/2016 9:35:17 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes

Good news is that Cruz has consistently defended firearms which you may know are actually specified in the 2nd amendment.

Absent such specification, states have a right to regulate under the 10th amendment


75 posted on 04/14/2016 11:28:49 AM PDT by lonestar67 (Trump is anti-conservative / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson