Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buckeye McFrog
I do too. It will be a perfect excuse to illustrate the idea of federalism. Texas should be allowed to regulate (or not regulate) dildos. Colorado should be allowed to regulate (or not regulate) marijuana. New York should be able to regulate (or not regulate) soft drinks. California should be able to regulate (or not regulate) automobile emissions. North Carolina should be able to regulate (or not regulate) public restroom use, etc.....
20 posted on 04/14/2016 9:32:27 AM PDT by nitzy (I don't vote for Republican'ts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: nitzy

You have it backwards.

The Texas Court ruled against the Texas-toy law.

Ted appealed to the Appellate Court, lost.

Ted was going to take it to SCOTUS.

He’s the one that was making a federal case out of the local issue.


73 posted on 04/14/2016 11:10:37 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy

I do too. It will be a perfect excuse to illustrate the idea of federalism. Texas should be allowed to regulate (or not regulate) dildos. Colorado should be allowed to regulate (or not regulate) marijuana. New York should be able to regulate (or not regulate) soft drinks. California should be able to regulate (or not regulate) automobile emissions. North Carolina should be able to regulate (or not regulate) public restroom use, etc.....


^^^^^^^^^ THIS


83 posted on 04/14/2016 3:38:29 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson