[Vigilanteman]

Cruz was solicitor general of Texas at the time. It was his job and sworn duty to defend the state laws as they were, not according to what he felt was popular.

Fast forward to 2013-2014 when pissant judges made homo marriage legal by judicial fiat in state after state and the attorney general's office refused to challenge them.

Isn't it only natural that the Supreme Court also felt they could mandate it by judicial fiat in the summer of 2015?

[lonestar67]

I think we agree— maybe I am wrong.

Of course Cruz was not solicitor general in 2013. I think the Supreme Court made a terrible decision forcing gay marriage on states.

I frankly think it violates the establishment clause and marriage should be treated as an establishment of religion.

If you are trying to reverse engineer some sort of blame on Cruz for the SC decision, I am willing to take a shot at the argument.