I assume you posted this to diminish Cruz. In the interest of a productive and effective discussion, exactly HOW does this do that?
Declare in detail what is wrong with the positions that Cruz took in behalf of the state.
Seriously don-o?
You’re asking me to read a 76 page legal brief on a case that Cruz lost at the State level and again at the US District Appellate Court. His argument failed and you haven’t bothered to look at the basic summary.
At a glance, this statement jumps out from the article. “Cruz’s office argued that the prior ruling would
>>give all manner of deviants grounds to claim that “engaging in consensual adult incest or bigamy” must be legal as they have a right to “enhance their sexual experiences.” <<<
They lost the motion and ultimately chose not to bring the matter to the Supreme Court.Cruz’s office argued that the prior ruling would give all manner of deviants grounds to claim that “engaging in consensual adult incest or bigamy” must be legal as they have a right to “enhance their sexual experiences.” They lost the motion and ultimately chose not to bring the matter to the Supreme Court.
I understand that you revere Ted Cruz, but do you honestly feel that legalizing Texan’s adult play-toys would result in the legalization of incest or bigamy? It’s been well over a decade since toy-ban was overturned, and incest and bigamy have not been legalized in Texas.
52 posts before the question was asked that matters. Thank you.