Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Woot! Woot! Good stuff New York News & Observer: The Daily Intelligence.

Highhhhhlarious.

Say, NYN&O:TDI, tell the one about Hillary defending a pervert who raped a twelve year old girl and then laughing about how he passed a lie detector test when she knew he was guilty as sin.

That's always good for a chuckle.

Yeah, yeah. I know the cases aren't exactly the same. I know Ted Cruz was duty bound as Solicitor General to make the case on behalf of the State of Texas whereas Hillary was under no obligation to represent the rapist, but, still!, funny, funny, funny.

Go ahead. Tell the story. You can tell it a lot better than I can.

117 posted on 04/14/2016 6:26:05 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle

Wrong, Cruz wasn’t ‘duty bound’ to take this case. Nor was he bound to concoct the argument that was presented before the court. No one forced Cruz to plea this case. ‘Discovery’ must have been insightful.

Choices

Free Will


121 posted on 04/14/2016 6:45:56 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson