I deal with facts then try to draw reasonable conclusions. Go online a##-hat and you will see the actual appearance notice. This is what it shows:
ARREST/NOTICE TO APPEAR
Then in the first section under Administration it states:
Date of Arrest: 03/29/2016
Then
Time of Arrest: 08:10
Then
Charge: BATTERY-SIMPLE (TOUCH OR STRIKE)
Then
Statute Violation Number: 784.03(1)(A)(1)
Now if you have the document in front of you notice where “Booking Date” is left blank.
Which means his fingerprints, mugshot were not taken. If the prosecutor had decided to proceed on this bogus “charge” then he would have had to be “booked.”
So as noted when the press used “charge” it was merely in a colloquial sense.
Secondly, the Jupiter Police themselves noted he was arrested. Thats a fact.
Again, so what? The prosecutor, despite all the drama is not proceeding with any ‘charge’ because the case is bs. Just like your posting.
LOL. This is the level of discourse you are capable of. I am glad that you took the time to get the facts that you didn't have before.
Which means his fingerprints, mugshot were not taken. If the prosecutor had decided to proceed on this bogus “charge” then he would have had to be “booked.”
So unless the prosecutor decides to pursue the charges, someone is not booked? That doesn't make sense. People are booked all the time without waiting for the prosecutor's decision.
The Trump camp has contested the assertion that Corey was "arrested." Here is the FL Criminal Code on Notice to appear
If I recall, your post doesn't include it, there was a court date set sometime in May. The prosecutor appears to have short-circuited the process without Corey even having his day in court. Does this really constitute an arrest and something that will be on his record?
Again, so what? The prosecutor, despite all the drama is not proceeding with any ‘charge’ because the case is bs. Just like your posting.
I have always said it was BS, including the "arrest." Trump's political opponents and the MSM made it into a much larger issue than it really was. Cruz and Kasich called for the firing of Corey. 16 female "journalists" signed a petition calling for his removal and that criminal charges were justified.
At 2 PM we will hear from the Clinton supporter prosecutor who will no doubt imply that the decision not to prosecute does not mean that Corey was innocent of the charges, just that they had insufficient evidence to convict him. And then the drumbeat will once again start for his removal.
In the meantime Fields is threatening a civil suit against Corey and Trump for defamation. It is all BS, but you need to do your homework before making assumptions. And name calling does nothing for your assertions.