[Lent]

Yeah I think we’re talking the same thing. “Charge” is the convenient notion and it’s used repeatedly. So for example in Criminal Defence Lawyer published by NOLO:

http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/criminal-offense/pressing-charges-a-criminal-act.htm

“If the police arrest the accused person, the prosecutor will review the police report and determine whether the government can proceed on the charges. “

I think we mean the same thing. But good points.

[Cboldt]

In this case and investigation, Lewandowski wasn't arrested either. Yes, there was an accusation, but that's all. The accusation still exists, accusations never "go away," they are either acted on, which amounts to charging and proceeding to trial or plea bargain, or not acted on.

Like if the cops have probable cause to pull you over on suspicion of DUI. You get pulled over. They had probable cause. They figure out you were herding your cat, not drunk. You drive away. They still had probable cause, that never goes away.

I don't know if the public distinguishes between "accused" and "charged." I think it does. I think the public views "charged" as more serious than "accused." The press reported for days that Lewandowski was charged with a crime. He'll survive. Over-reaching claims is pretty common. Probaly more common than honest claims.