Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Mocks FBI Investigation: You'll Never See Me In Handcuffs! (They'll never take me alive!)
Freedom Outpost ^ | 4/12/2016

Posted on 04/13/2016 6:30:11 AM PDT by HomerBohn

Hillary Clinton recently demonstrated just how arrogant and corrupt she really is by mocking the ongoing FBI investigation into her criminal activities regarding her illegal personal email server. On top of that, she may be exposing just how corrupt the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice is as well.

Appearing on the Today show, Hillary was asked by Matt Lauer, "They are clinging to the hope that the way they will be able to deal with that, is that at some point between now and the election… that they will get to see Hillary Clinton in handcuffs… that there will be some kind of political perp walk based on your private email server."

(Watch Hillary's Video at the link)

Laughing like she did about getting child rapists off the hook, Hillary literally cackled at the thought. "Oh my goodness!" she bellowed.

"That is not going to happen," Clinton boasted. "There is not even the remotest chance that is going to happen."

She then went on to downplay the investigation into her crimes.

"It's a security review and there are lots of those that are conducted in our government all the time," said Clinton. "And you don't hear about most of them. You'll only hear about this one because, you know, it does, uh, involve me. So, that's why it gets so much attention."

Well, of course! You were a former Secretary of State who could not follow federal law and makes sure your emails were secure! Now you have your hand out asking the American people for the White House! Of course, it's going to get attention.

Judge Andrew Napolitano weighed in on Mrs. Clinton's mockery of the seriousness of the crimes that she has committed.

"It is a perfect storm of legal misery for Mrs. Clinton," he told FOX News. "What she has done for the umpteenth time in public is sent a dog whistle to the FBI – a signal to the FBI. She forgot they were watching. She knows it's a criminal investigation. She knows she is the target of the criminal investigation. She knows the government has an extraordinary amount of resources investigating her and she's laughing at them."

"Not a good thing to do," said Napolitano.

Unless, of course, you know that the corrupt people in DC are going to have your back, right?

One could hope that the FBI and the DOJ would prove me wrong and do what is right under the law. I'm not holding my breath on this one considering the lawless one that heads up the DOJ.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonduo; evilhilarythewitch; hillarythecrook; maclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: TomGuy


61 posted on 04/13/2016 7:47:17 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Noah: 'When the animals began to pair up by specie and stand in line, I really took notice.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I’m tired of this shi’ite. Come on Comey, make the recommendation or close the investigation.


62 posted on 04/13/2016 7:48:09 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Those handcuffs are the same as yours Miz Krinton...
except there is no mink lining.

Not only should she be prosecuted, she should be persecuted!


63 posted on 04/13/2016 7:49:07 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
 photo 972d7325-e6ff-482a-82b7-aa033892342a_zpss7wkdqwj.jpg
64 posted on 04/13/2016 7:52:26 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

65 posted on 04/13/2016 7:53:13 AM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: hillarynot

“The way she confidently plays down the investigation and firmly states she won’t get indicted is just proof to me she’s already been told she’s in the clear.”

I don’t think she would be mocking them if that were the case. Instead, she would be praising the FBI for conducting a professional and thorough investigation that will show no wrongdoing.


66 posted on 04/13/2016 7:54:14 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hillary had best be careful. Obama may eat her.

No. That would never happen. Where’s Bill?


67 posted on 04/13/2016 7:55:49 AM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

“You are ensuring HRC is above the law by perpetuating this negative stuff. Start fighting.”

Right on. Thanks for posting that. I’m tired of reading posts that say “she’ll never be indicted”, “she’s going to skate”, etc. People that roll over like that are part of the problem.

If the facts don’t support a recommendation for indictment then fine. I think that if the public is informed about what the investigation finds then it’ll be pretty obvious whether or not a crime was committed (if it isn’t already.


68 posted on 04/13/2016 7:58:53 AM PDT by jcmccorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I don’t need to see her in cuffs, if they just take her out back and hand her a loaded .45 with the choice: you do it or we will.


69 posted on 04/13/2016 8:07:48 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

Truly, then one can be hoisted upon their own petard to levels above the law!

H proves it.


70 posted on 04/13/2016 8:12:52 AM PDT by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Napoleon XIV: ‘They’re coming to take me away’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4


71 posted on 04/13/2016 8:26:21 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
We say public service, they say public, serve us.

The only way we'll get back to the idea of public service is to make it impossible to become fabulously wealthy in public office. TERM LIMITS is a start; two terms in any one office, then out. The cream will rise to the top, as the congresscritter who serves well may become the senator for two terms, then maybe his state's governor (or in the other order, gov-cong-sen). But that will eliminate 95+% of career politicians. And no special perks; they have to abide by the laws they pass. SS, Medicare, Obamacare, no exemptions from labor laws for their staffs, no pensions except those they choose to fund, like the rest of us.

And all political contributions must be ANONYMOUS. They can't sell influence if they don't know who is buying. Americans should be permitted to donate any amount to any candidate or party they choose; that's FREEDOM. But any "pay to play", tit-for-tat arrangements are BRIBERY, and that's a crime.

72 posted on 04/13/2016 8:29:15 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

“The way she confidently plays down the investigation and firmly states she won’t get indicted is just proof to me she’s already been told she’s in the clear.”

I thinks it’s just bravado.


73 posted on 04/13/2016 8:32:06 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hillarynot

She could just be trying to get the nomination locked up as quickly as possible to make it politically impossible, or at least much more difficult.


74 posted on 04/13/2016 8:32:46 AM PDT by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

“The fact that she mocks the FBI in an angered manner shows that she’s concerned.”

Exactly. If she’d been assured she’d be protected, those same people would have told her to be respectful and calm when answering questions about the investigation. From the time this story broke thirteen months ago, HRC obviously has been ticked off by it, which is not how she’d react if she really knew it were under control.


75 posted on 04/13/2016 8:34:28 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

I prefer they post their thoughts so I can disabuse them.

What many are missing is that Sander’s success and Hillary’s steadily dropping approval rating means she’s getting to the point she will no longer be regarded as viable by the party elite. Obama had to coerce the big donors to help her.

With the upcoming FBI revelations detailing her racketeering, she’s essentially a zombie candidate. The demographic she’s still appealing to won’t be enough to get her over the top even with vote fraud.


76 posted on 04/13/2016 8:59:23 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

“Top of the world, Ma! Top of the world!”


77 posted on 04/13/2016 9:17:46 AM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

“Hussein is gonna have to preemptively pardon her ...”

Does a pardon mean the accused has been found innocent, or does it mean there is no judgment of innocence or guilt?

Or can a pardon be bestowed only on someone that has been convicted?

Maybe the immediate question is, can someone be pardoned before they have had charges brought against them?


78 posted on 04/13/2016 9:26:10 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

From title “(They’ll never take me alive!)”

*****************************

Well, if that’s the case, let’s hope they at least try. /s


79 posted on 04/13/2016 9:29:40 AM PDT by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic

ping


80 posted on 04/13/2016 9:31:01 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson