Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
I guess that settles it. :-) Fat chance. ,p> The judge was:

a. Ignorant of the law
b. A GOP-e activist
c. An agent of the NWO
d. Bought
e. Intimidated
f. Senile...or otherwise confused

:-)

90 posted on 04/12/2016 6:54:58 PM PDT by okie01 (The of the Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: okie01; xzins

IIRC a lot of people here were DEMANDING that the issue be brought before the courts. So it was. And now everyone is whining about the decision. Whining. Whining. Whining.

Those who demanded the issue be brought before the courts and are now complaining about it are hypocrites. They wanted the issue, not the decision. They are only willing to play by the rules when they win. When they lose, they complain about the officiating.


99 posted on 04/12/2016 7:14:09 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: okie01; P-Marlowe; MinuteGal; LucyT

Nothing there at all!

This ruling originates from the meeting at SCOTUS January 14th, 2009 between John Roberts and Co and then Barry Soetoro, a deal made = (intimidation) NOT to touch ANY NBC issues. As you may see it has trickled down to ALL lower courts!!

Additionally helped by hack Jack Maskell to “brainwash” = intimidated 535 CONmen/CONwomen into silence as well!!!

Don’t you see ALL lawsuits has been dismissed and future will land in the waste baskets as well???


175 posted on 04/13/2016 8:51:07 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson