Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

The 6-2 decision of the Supreme Court has been precedential for the last 118 years. Your disagreement with that decision is noted but the Court’s ruling has not been overturned or invalidated by clarifying legislation or by another Supreme Court decision.
Anyone who meets the criteria for being a Citizen of the United States at Birth is also a Natural Born Citizen, at least unless and until some court rules otherwise.
Two courts have ruled that way concerning Ted Cruz’s eligibility.


257 posted on 04/14/2016 10:09:44 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

“The 6-2 decision of the Supreme Court has been precedential for the last 118 years.”

Yes, and you keep denying how that same U.S. Supreme Court explicitly said: United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....” Consequently, “A person” such as Ted Cruz “born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....” Yet, you just keep on dishonestly denying the plain words as if they did not exist like some character right out of the fairy tale story Alice in Wonderland.

“Your disagreement with that decision is noted but the Court’s ruling has not been overturned or invalidated by clarifying legislation or by another Supreme Court decision.”

There you go again with the dishonest false representations of what someone else said in order to put forth a deceitful strawman argument. The simple fact is that you do not even understand the fundamental basics of the word definitions you are using and/or you are falsely pretending you do not understand them to avoid acknowledging you arguments are a bunch of garbage inventions of fiction.

“Anyone who meets the criteria for being a Citizen of the United States at Birth is also a Natural Born Citizen, at least unless and until some court rules otherwise.”

Here you are putting forth that notorious lie time after time in complete defiance of the plain language in the U.S. Supreme Court case: United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....”

“Two courts have ruled that way concerning Ted Cruz’s eligibility.”

Neither of those courts can overrule the U.S. Constitution or the several U.S. Supreme Court decisions that invalidate their actions, nor do those courts have the power to invalidate Natural Law.


258 posted on 04/15/2016 3:14:26 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson