To: aMorePerfectUnion
I find it interesting that some of the people who reject the possibility of evolution happening over 100’s of millions or even billions of years have no trouble with it all happening since The Flood.
5 posted on
04/12/2016 8:00:04 AM PDT by
null and void
("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
To: null and void
I consider the diversity of species to just be natural selection and not evolution. No big deal.
7 posted on
04/12/2016 8:02:53 AM PDT by
aMorePerfectUnion
(BREAKING.... Vulgarian Resistance begins attack on the GOPe Death Star.....)
To: null and void
Evolution, changing of an organism to something new, is not true. Adaptation is.
You can breed dogs all day long, get LOTS of different forms....of dogs.
Get back to me when you get a Non-Dog.
9 posted on
04/12/2016 8:09:08 AM PDT by
RoadGumby
(This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
To: null and void
Most creationists have no problem with rapid speciation, it's the evolutionary explanation for the origin of Genus we take issue with. And abiogenesis.
FWIW, the fossil "record" does not support the evolutionary explanation of the origin of genus. If it did, there would be no Cambrian explosion, and no (silly) explanations like punctuated equilibrium.
44 posted on
04/13/2016 3:05:02 AM PDT by
jimmyray
(there is no problem so bad that you can't make it worse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson