I do have the email in question. I do not have to infer anything.
That is all fine and dandy. I was just curious about the line of attack he used in saying they didn't fight against the con con. They (Alabama leaders) went to great lengths to say (and probable prove) that at least on the front they were against the CC. The state has been accused of "racist language" in the old constitution, but every efforts to change the constitution has had back handed efforts to change other important parts of the constitution. Like one year they wanted to remove "racist" language, but at the same time change the constitution to where strike out the part that said it was NOT the government's job to educate (schools). I agree it is NOT the government's job so I voted against striking out the racist language just because they tried to sneak in a liberal agenda.