Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr

You didn’t understand. With less candidates Trump would have had more votes, those votes would have been more proportional.

But all that is aside from the problem with 60,000 people supposedly supporting Cruz 100%.

I look forward to you defending the position there was no corruption in Colorado.


47 posted on 04/11/2016 8:24:28 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

>>>With less candidates Trump would have had more votes, those votes would have been more proportional.

No.. proportionate is according to the proportion of votes. It’s not hard math.

>> problem with 60,000 people supposedly supporting Cruz 100%.

That would be another problem with math. Read the rules again. It doesn’t take 100% of the vote to elect a delegate.


54 posted on 04/11/2016 8:30:02 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

The question is still: In state’s with primaries, should the number of delegates for each candidate be equal to the proportion of votes for the candidate?

Would that be fair - in your opinion.


58 posted on 04/11/2016 8:37:21 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

But all that is aside from the problem with 60,000 people supposedly supporting Cruz 100%.


Ummm, small states such as Florida and Ohio have winner take all. Did 100% of Floridians vote for Trump? Geesh.


179 posted on 04/13/2016 5:40:47 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson