Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strac6

> here is an assumption that every passed and signed bill is a constitutional law, unless challenged in the courts and found unconstitutional.

Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971)

Under constitutional challenge here, primarily on Fifth Amendment due process grounds, but also on Fourteenth Amendment grounds, is § 301(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 236, 8 U.S.C.§ 1401(b).

We hold that § 301(b) has no constitutional infirmity in its application to plaintiff Bellei.


306 posted on 04/11/2016 8:42:08 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

This is not a self incrimination case. Nothing to due with this case, and you know it... or I certainly hope you do.

I don’t play legal BS games. The law, and the citizens it protects, are too important for that.

End of replying to your posts.


307 posted on 04/11/2016 8:45:32 PM PDT by Strac6 (Remember, the Primaries are shortlived. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson