Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasCajun

Did the people in Colorado have a say in that there would be no primary or caucus held in 2016? WTH is that all about? How can you defend the shenanigans of that process and the trickery it invites?


22 posted on 04/11/2016 4:47:33 AM PDT by tflabo (truth or tyrrany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: tflabo

The grassroots Republicans in the party have the say of how their process works. Why would you open up party rules to a popular vote? That makes no sense.


24 posted on 04/11/2016 4:55:53 AM PDT by reegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: tflabo

The general population no, but the political parties have organizers and members and events across the state that define their rules. Then the Secretary of State for each of those states had to approve of the particular process of each party.


37 posted on 04/11/2016 5:15:41 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: tflabo; TexasCajun
Did the people in Colorado have a say in that there would be no primary or caucus held in 2016? WTH is that all about? How can you defend the shenanigans of that process and the trickery it invites?

TexasCajun can't. It's an ethics issue.

41 posted on 04/11/2016 5:29:11 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson