Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strac6

Evidence in the public domain already shows that Clinton was warned about the Blackberry being massively vulnerable. She is guilty of gross, deliberate mishandling of restricted data, at a minimum. Obama has no way of knowing her intent or the actual effects of her actions on national security. Proving either is not required under the laws that govern this issue, for good reason. Obama knows that and is lying to trick the gullible,

Chris Wallace should have asked Obama if he was familiar with the content of all Hillary’s messages, including those she had deleted by her minions. Then ask Obama and Woodward whether someone that “careless” with national security could ever be trusted to be President.


41 posted on 04/10/2016 5:57:28 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chewbarkah

Totally correct and on point.


42 posted on 04/10/2016 6:01:29 PM PDT by Strac6 (Remember, the Primaries are shortlived. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson