“The case turned on the distinction between “naturalized in the US” and “natrualized outside of the US.””
No, it did not.
Absurd.
Rogers v. Bellei turned on whether Bellei had complied with the STATUTE.
And it turned on whether Bellei had anything to lose.
How could Bellei lose his citizenship if he never had it to being with?
HMMMM??
You have serious reading comprehension and honesty problems. When I reply to your posts, I am really talking to other readers. Your posts are nothing more than a vehicle for me to start from.