“4 Supreme Courts have ruled on this issue.”
No, they have not. No case has decided that a person born outside of the United States to US citizen parents is not a natural born citizen.
So you admit to not reading the cases. Thanks for playing. Now go back to helping nominate Ryan so Hillary can be your president.
IF Mitch the Senate will not resolve Cruz eligible why would you try and subvert the Constitution?
“Mitch McConnell: Why no, the Senate won’t pass a resolution affirming Cruz’s eligibility like it did for McCain”
You cannot apply simple logic.
If a case says that person Y *IS* a natural born citizen under the following circumstances: ABC.
You are so illogical that you think that says other people are NOT natural born citizens.
The cases occasionally say someone IS a natural born citizen.
There are no cases saying who is NOT a natural born citizen.
You flunk simple logic.
Your false logic is like this:
Grandma Brown testified that it was raining at the time, so we conclude that it was raining.
Then you claim that ONLY Grandma Brown can say that it was raining. No one else can testify about whether it was raining.
Because a court relied on Grandma Brown’s testimony, you say that courts forever after can ONLY rely on Grandma Brown’s testimony.
A case saying someone IS a natural born citizen DOES NOT establish that someone else ISN’T.
Simple logic.