whee forced demographic change
No one wants to the the "Indian". The British began forced demographic change on the Irish in 1169, with the planned extermination and replacement of the native population.
The British did it again in N American, using English & German settlers to force out and take over native American lands. (Which of course they had done themselves to whoever was here beforehand.)
So, the Brits, English & Germans were the "winners" during the first two go arounds. But, starting in the 1840s, Irish, Italians and E Europeans began emigrating in large numbers to the US, resulting in the first coordinated push-back.
However, like the Irish & Indians before them, the original US stock lost out to the pig-men who were interested in both breaking established democratic conventions, and having a more malleable work force for the emerging industrial factories.
Fast forward to 1922 when immigration began to be shut-down, until the 1965 Kennedy sponsored act which re-opened the spigot. The result we see today is the "white" middle class (English, Germans, and **now** Irish, Italians & E Europeans) being replaced by Hispanics (primarily Mexicans) and Asians (primarily Chinese).
But, that's not the end of the story ie history. At some point in the future, the "new" Americans will be subject to the same forced demographic change as were all other previous waves. At this point, it's apparent the newly introduced populations will be from the MENA region, as is being witnessed in Europe at the present moment.
Using the refugee status label is actually a very clever move, because there is literally no upper bound or limit. One can only image the hue & cry 50 years from now when the newly enfranchised Americans (Hispanics & Asians) start screaming about the newly introduced populations aimed at replacing them with more tractable sheep.
And after the MENA folks 50, 100, 150 years out? Maybe Indian/Pakistan, sub-Sahara Africa, etc. It doesn't really matter as long as the newly introduced populations fit the same role, primarily destroying democratic institutions of self-government and providing an easily manageable work force.
The problem with the population being replaced - in this case, us - is that we never experienced what it what like to be on the losing end. It's not fun, and because we have high expectations and a sense of entitlement ie "it's our country", we've never considered that someone before us had the same exact sentiments.
What does history record of their complaints? Nada, zilch; or they are framed as a sub-species, deserving to be replaced. See: American Indian.