Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

You obviously have not paid any attention, but that does not surprise me one bit. You Trump cultists are not only blind, you’re deaf too


32 posted on 04/08/2016 9:28:07 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed theThe l ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

that is because we are all type a males and females who burned our ears out at the firing range, even though we used top quality head gear for a few dozen years.


34 posted on 04/08/2016 9:34:52 PM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (When you see a drowning liberal, throw them the anchor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Huh?


37 posted on 04/08/2016 9:35:41 PM PDT by glock rocks (TTTT !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
You Trump cultists are not only blind, you’re deaf too

Way to be persuasive old boy.

Let's just be condescending and insulting to Trump supporters. That'll get them voting for Cruz......

41 posted on 04/08/2016 9:46:38 PM PDT by Lakeshark (One time Cruz supporter who now prefers Trump. Yes, there are good reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

‘you trump cultists’

You betcha, I’m a Trump supporter. He’s a winner who’s set the pace in the race, not only in votes received and states won, but in policy positions.

I’m a little surprised you’re parroting the ‘cultist’ thing, tho; it’s such a cop-out. It’s obvious as the day is long the purpose of the author, as explicitly mentioned five times, and alluded to in every paragraph, is to beat the Trump is anti-woman drum by resurrecting the very dusty ‘male chauvinist’ label, while employing not so subtle ageism.

So let me say this: We women are not fragile little violets who need a man to tell us who is or isn’t a male chauvinist as if we’re incapable of making that judgment ourselves. That is the ultimate in male chauvinism. And as for a straight male who criticizes a woman’s appearance (gays get a pass, don’tcha know), perhaps the author could ponder a column on Mr. Cruz, in his latest attempt at late-night humor, referring to Hillary as ‘wild eyed’. Which, if I were a flaming feminist (or male apologist as the author appears to be), might just be considered chauvinistic, too. As is Cruz not emphatically denouncing and disassociating himself from the PAC who objectified Melania Trump in a Cruz promotional ad. It doesn’t matter that I agree with Cruz on Hillary - I have an automatic woman hall-pass. But under the author’s own standards, Cruz doesn’t. And while Trump can find excuse in being raised during ‘the chauvinistic era’, as the author points out, Cruz can’t make any such claim. I doubt we’ll see an article calling Cruz out, tho. Which makes this article just another pearl-clutching, double-standard #NeverTrump hit piece in a sea of others.

The author really should go play with the rest of the snowflakes terrified by #TheChalkening.


65 posted on 04/09/2016 7:58:14 PM PDT by blueplum (March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson