I am not the one purposely ignoring something. The Founders passed the 1790 Act and almost immediately realized it was flawed and not what they had meant to achieve. They repealed it and the replacement Law specifically did not grant natural born status to foreign born children of American citizens.
All most immediately as in ... after another election, different congress (not so much the founders anymore) and FIVE years later. Sound more like the ebb and flow of politics.
BTW, by your logic, this act has to be ignored as well ‘cause it was repealed and replaced with the naturalization act of 1798 (after only 3 years), which was repealed by the naturalization act of 1802 (after only 4 years).
And so on and so forth