Some Pro-Trump Twitter Accounts Appear To Be Part Of Marketing Campaign

The Daily Caller ^ | 4/8/16 | Derek Hunter

[MAD-AS-HELL]

Some of Donald Trump’s support on Twitter comes from accounts with zero followers who tweet identical messages and who have been part of social media marketing campaigns in the past.

[MAD-AS-HELL]

One has to wonder about the pro Trump trolls who have invaded this "conservative" web site. It most likely is planned by the Democrat Weasels at the Trump Campaign. If you believe in the Constitution and conservatism, you aren't a Trump supporter.

[Mechanicos]

Ryan nominating Cruz supporters need to get up to speed.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/04/07/campaign-ad-new-paul-ryan-video-raises-questions/

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/275496-hatch-potential-for-ryan-to-be-drafted-at-convention

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/paul-ryan-could-make-2016-normal-again/2016/04/05/ca6dc99c-fb6f-11e5-886f-a037dba38301_story.html

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/mark-finkelstein/2016/04/05/heilemann-dan-senor-stop-lying-about-ryan-not-seeking

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/05/forget-trump-paul-ryan-is-the-likely-gop-nominee-commentary.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/charles-koch-paul-ryan-nomination_us_57029099e4b083f5c6082b95?mzr2202rb15q4zpvi&can_id=

Many Many more telling you their plan. Whatever deal Cruz made with the GOPe to stay in after losing the south and keep Trump from winning outright apparently did not include Cruz being the Nominee.

[lodi90]

I see ZERO primary season only Trump FReepers. OTOH, Cruz and the other candidates had PLENTY OF ONE HIT WONDER FReepers.

[moehoward]

Ain’t that the truth. There’s only a handful that stick around to defend their Lyin’Ted talking points.

[jimfree]

Astounding! Twitter as a marketing tool? Imagine that.

[bigbob]

Why don’t you take your conerns up with the Boss?

He’s made his feelings clear. it’s it’s damned impolite of you to be trying to run things when you’re nothing but a pissant.

[Dr. Sivana]

If you believe in the Constitution and conservatism, you aren't a Trump supporter.

Different people support Trump for different reasons. Phyllis Schlafley believes in the Constitution and conservatism. For some conservatives, it is an existential question, taking a bigger than life character with his own stash of resources and 30 years of defined persona to get the job done, even if imperfectly.

For others, it is a need to clean the augean stables before more thoughtful conservatives do the hardwork of recalibrating and rebuilding intellectual scaffolding with a fresh foundation. For others, it is a pure nationalism play, nationalism in the good (non-globalist) sense.

I do not personally trust Trump, but his supporters do. I will NOT accuse their conservatism or their constitutionalism. Trump's weak there, but anti-PC is a great starting point. There is no need around here to start hurling excommunications back and forth.

[C210N]

There’s only a handful that stick around to defend their Lyin’Ted talking points.

Not much desire to do so, when rationale and logic only get answered with vitriol and name-calling. The end is the same, no minds are changed. Go ahead, burn your bridge. Of course, you have not yet crossed it being shy of 1237.

[1rudeboy]

After 37 seconds, we get a cut & paste hit job on Cruz, on a thread that does not concern him. Does Trump know you’re slacking on the job?

[hoosiermama]

Plenty of those CRUz supporters also follow his NAU path. Or do they ?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gXcYCwaBKnQ

Truths Teds supporters won’t admit are wrong? Do they share these views? Are they truly in favor of open borders and destroying our soverienty ? Are they even aware of his anti United States stance?

Each should be asked repeatedly if they are in favor of NAU and shown the above video if they say no. IF yes Jim Robinson should dismiss them from the site. IMO

[frankenMonkey]

[moehoward]

Negative. The proof is in the pudding. The FR nightly caucus proves how many Cruz followers are active members vs campaign shills.

What was Cruz’s tally last night ? 18 or 20% ?

[LS]

Um, I’ve been here longer than you have.

No, I recognize most of the pro-Trump people here. I recognize very few of the anti-Truper/pro-Cruz people.

And on Twitter? I think you would call ALL the NRO douchebags part of an “Anti-Trump” marketing campaign.

[Smokin' Joe]

There have been quite a few who were banned and aren’t here any more to defend anything.

[X-spurt]

All you need to do is look up many of the more rabid Trumpbot’s sign up date to see the correlation.

Trump is a Master Marketer, for sure. National politics was just a bit too complicated for him. BS only goes so far.

[Smokin' Joe]

I pointed out early on that the Dawnold had his own marketing departments. It is no surprise that he is using them to feed his stuff into the alternate media, nor that he just might be inflating his own status by doing so.

[moehoward]

So they were’nt actually “defending” as much as they were insulting and disrupting conversation.

[jacquej]

I am not a Democrat Weasel, am very conservative, and want to see the Constitution followed to the letter of the law.

I started off supporting Cruz, and donated right at the beginning. He lost me along the way, and I now support Trump.

You are entitled to your opinion of those of us who now support Trump, but calling us “trolls” is ridiculous.

Many of us have been here since the beginning of FreeRepublic, and resent your assumption of our motives in supporting him.

I think you should apologize.

[Smokin' Joe]

Most of their ‘about’ pages are a quick read, too. Even the older signup dates.

[lodi90]

Ain’t that the truth. There’s only a handful that stick around to defend their Lyin’Ted talking points.

---

They’ll soon be gone like the shills who pushed Pat Roberts from Kansas in 2014. We’re just the unwashed knuckle dragging masses and unworthy of their time outside of election season.