you responded to comment 8, and I quote... “Whether he was a citizen of the US is a matter for US law, not Canadian law...”
I provided the US law that states that for constitutional purposes, Cruz is a naturalized US citizen who entered the US as a ‘nonquota’ immigrant. Is there some part of the definition of ‘immigrant’ that is hard for you to comprehend? Is there some part of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 that governs the nationality of Ted Cruz that remains foreign to your understanding of the difference between natural born and naturalization?
No, I wrote comment 8, in which I was responding to this, by quote:
"When Cruz was born on Dec. 22, 1970 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Canada didn't allow for dual citizenship, indicating Cruz was only a citizen of Canada."
That statement says Cruz was only a citizen of Canada because Canada didn't allow for dual citizenship. Which is nonsense because Canadian law doesn't control who is a US citizen. As I pointed out.