Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevcol
Historically the US borrowed in war time and paid off the debt in peace time. This seems reasonable and prudent. One borrows out of necessity, and eliminates debt and interest burdens as soon as possible.

We have since learned that the world has a great appetite for US Government debt. Is permanent and increasing debt OK? Intuitively, we know it isn't. Our intuition is right.

Many Americans want the government to spend on them and their causes. Can't we just pretend that debt (or taxes, or inflation) are essentially costless, or the cost falls on someone else? As Obama might say “yes we can.” Unfortunately, believing a falsehood does not help.

I think the only answer is to address spending, primarily entitlements. The entire idea of being “entitled” is wrong. I accept that those who have put money into a program, for example social security or medicare, should get their money back. I believe in compassion, but not "public compassion." We should get the government out of the charity business.

21 posted on 04/07/2016 5:55:38 AM PDT by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took Congress in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ChessExpert

Debt is not fundamentally wrong; as you pointed out sometimes procuring debt is necessary. However uncontrolled debt is absolutely obscene and dangerous in the long term. Hard to meet our current/future spending obligations with $19 trillion (Growing) in the hole and expect a healthy/thriving country/economy.


27 posted on 04/07/2016 6:25:52 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson