Are you saying that you want the nominee to not accept the support of the RNC, but rather to promise publicly to destroy the RNC, and replace all/most Republican members of Congress?
Because that may sound very cathartic to some, but if that's what Trump only intends, he will get zero support, and have zero chance of winning the general election. So it will be a big meaningless threat that results in him losing.
>>the support of the RNC
The RNC didn’t become the spendid Cluster Frack that it is overnight.
It did so in a moral vacuum that was allowed to exist because We the People FAILED to exercise ownership over Government of the People, By the People, For the People.
That state of affairs can’t be changed overnight, and can ultimately only be corrected, as Jefferson observed - by facilitating the education (and enlightened morality) of the common people and the government We consent to having operate by proxy on our behalf.
Furthermore morality, or the increasing lack thereof, is symptomatic of the cancer that can be seen germinating within the “Reality” TeeVee fantasy the sheeple have been mesmerized into worshiping over the past 14 years.
The advertising Sponsors of The D/RNC Uniparty (AKA Bread and Circuses-R-Us) know the Sheeple want a quick political fix.
They also know there is no quick fix and it’s not in their self-serving nature to tell the truth about that, especially when the lies can be gamed so profitably — so they let the dramatic charade continue.
Jefferson knew the nature of the Sponsors. So did Jesus when He drew their sins in the sand.
Extracting ourselves from their purview is a slow process that WE are responsible for - not Trump, not Cruz, not Clinton or Sanders - WE. ARE. RESPONSIBLE.