Twice in a row, you attack Palin
I explained why her own flip flop was relevant.
...instead of attacking her arguments.
I criticized her arguments.
Look, you are either being dishonest or you're not very bright.
I'm not going to argue further with you.
I don’t give damn about what you said on the thread above; I’m criticizing YOUR posts. Specifically, the ones that I’ve replied to.
And you know? Your ‘whether the flip-flop is relevant’ is little more than you saying that it is because you said so. I believe that the term is ‘begging the question.’
Also, personal insults.
Therefore, you have surpassed the trifecta.
Logical fallacy: Ad hominem, but this time directly at me.
Good day! Thanks for letting me have the last word.