[Bryanw92]

>>At this point, it appears that he is right to avoid this issue.

Every campaign should avoid it. It is an issue that is too emotionally-charged on both sides to have meaningful discussion.

Nothing short of a Constitutional amendment will end it and there is no way that it would be ratified. Perhaps when we have the Short But Victorious Civil War that everyone dreams of, we can just shoot all the pro-choicers (to save duh chilluns, ya know).

[HiTech RedNeck]

It would not be Donald-like to do so, even if the first attempts resulted in sticking his foot into it.

In a way he’s even been correct. Abortion generally is self-punishing to the woman and that is how it was mostly viewed prior to Roe v. Wade. We don’t need to adjust any laws, of which there are a plethora of court-suppressed ones. We need to adjust the court.

[ronnietherocket3]

Every campaign should avoid it. It is an issue that is too emotionally-charged on both sides to have meaningful discussion.

A better way to handle it would probably be, "I was happy when my wife told me she was pregnant and I am happy to have children." Or, "I thought it was cute when my daughter came running up to me with this picture she drew in art class." One thing that appears to be missing from the pro-life movement is an actual happiness to have children.