Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana

I hope you are right, but I get a sick feeling when I read what some of the delegates themselves are saying. One in particular yesterday was saying the voters don’t select candidates, they select delegates and the delegates select the candidates. I’ve never seen a delegate’s name on the ballot.


102 posted on 04/01/2016 2:02:34 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin

Depends on the state. Some states do have delegates on the ballot, usually selected by a candidate’s campaign. And most have a series of meetings where potential delegates are dealt with face to face. There’s no substitute for personal involvement with other like-minded people.


103 posted on 04/01/2016 2:07:44 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Hugin
One in particular yesterday was saying the voters don’t select candidates, they select delegates and the delegates select the candidates. I’ve never seen a delegate’s name on the ballot.

Technically, he is right. However, it is not as bad as it sounds. It is kind of like a decentralized and messier version of the Electoral College. When you vote in November, you are actually voting for a slate of electors. Some states DO list the delegates name, Illinois for example, which had two elections, one for candidate, and one for electors. The reason for this are historical, but you needed to check both.
104 posted on 04/01/2016 2:16:07 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit."-R.Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson