And they say you can't ask them about their junk(genitals).
They are continually obsessed with genitals. When aren’t they going on about junk.
Sorry, Sam.
You don’t have the right to visit your disorder on my kids or grandkids in a public restroom.
The needs of society outweigh those of the individual.
You want to be Queen For a Day, you do it at home and don’t bother the rest of us.
So this is a dude in a dress. Sorry, don’t have time for further inquiry or explanation.
I couldn’t care less what lies under its underwear. I can understand why some people would think this is an appropriate question, much as
“I’m pregnant “
“oh, when’s the baby due?”
This creature is screwed up in the head.
Sam, if you keep bringing up your “anatomy” in conversations, then you’ve no cause to complain if people discuss it. Particularly if it’s in any way unusual or interesting, of course. People are social beings and usually will discuss topics you choose to bring up. It’s that simple. ( ps: I have the biggest parts in ton but I don’t go around talking about them. Teasing, yes, but there’s a point. Don’t bring up topics you don’t want to discuss!! Get it? Simple. ).
I have never, and I'm fairly certain this is a categorical statement, inquired of another individual about his or her genitalia, not even in a Navy clap line, where I was only doing research, thank you very much. "Yo, so do you have a hairy hoo-hoo or a purple-headed acorn of lust?" has never passed my lips in casual conversation whatever my level of curiosity, which, truth be told, is pretty much nonexistent anyway. This is, however, one of those arenas where interest and non-interest may have equally catastrophic results in terms of legal action and outraged SJW demonstrations on my front lawn.
Politesse is therefore the order of the day. One cannot even take refuge in the nominally neutral "what the hell are you, butterbuns?" inasmuch as the addressee may find any finite answer impossibly restrictive - yes, Virginia, there is such a term as "genderfluid" for the determinedly undecided and you're a bigot if you think it's the funniest damn thing you've ever heard, much less say so. O tempora, O mores!, a Latin phrase referring to fried fish but I'm not going there.
Elementary schools want to teach the children about the New Normals. Pretty soon, you won’t be able to opt your child out of it. Meanwhile, they will sneak the ‘training’in, by whatever means necessary. Entire school districts feel they must buy into this, or chance losing thousands of dollars in federal funding.
XX or XY ??
If a someone claims to be neither male or female then they are not human as far as I’m concerned. They can get the hell off Earth and return to whatever planet they came from.
My policy is a compromise; I will only call trannies “she” if they have their male junk removed. Not that it really makes them female, but at least it shows commitment.
Unless its sex chromosomes exhibit some unusual abnormality, it’s either male or female, even if its “junk” either due to natural causes or mutilation doesn’t match the chromosomes.
Whatever, freak!
you can’t ask hem about their junk, but they can walk into a woman’s bathroom, drop their pants, exposing their junk to a woman or her child, and now can’t be sued for indecent exposure- and a woman can’t complain that her daughter was forced to view a filthy pervert’s junk-
Pervert.
Let a madman stick a snubnose in their beltline at a
downward angle, and see how quick they make
up their mind.
The comments section below the article is unreal. People defending this guy/gal/thing.
One thing that’s weird about the article is that the person correctly states that “sex” and “gender” are not the same, but then goes on to use “gender” in contexts that call for “sex.”
These sickos are unbelievably obsessed with their genitals. They never stop talking about them and what they do with them. They also want special rights because of how they misuse them. You’re either a male or a female, stop lying to get attention.
The amazing thing about living in these modern times is that a simple blood test can answer that question for you. Isn’t it amazing that libs consider themselves scientifically superior to conservatives, yet they deny science at every turn?