I know. I'm just focused on the distortion of the article. A border patrol union endorsing Trump is very favorable. A federal employee union endorsing Trump can go either way but the author used it as a slam.
The truth is the border patrol union endorsed him which is a very significant endorsement and should be the focus.
Ahh. I see. I did not have time to read the full thing. So, I was correct, in a way, they were trying to paint Trump in a way to make him less palatable than he is.