[hinckley buzzard]

The standard position of the Right to Life movement has been eventually to return abortion statutes to the states, wage the battle there, end legal unrestricted abortion, and bring sanctions against abortion providers, not the women seeking them. For compassionate reasons, the woman has been seen as a victim as well as the baby. One does not seek to punish the victim.

I don't like Cruz much but his position is fully within this strategic plan. To say he "supports abortion" is a total lie.

[xzins]

Hinckley, you’re a good person, but “no consequence abortion” is a pro-abortion position.

“No consequence illegal immigration” is a pro-illegal immigration position. Why can we see that so clearly with illegal immigration, but we want to play games with the abortion issue.

Let’s be very honest. The pro-life movement has been selling us a bill of goods, or they haven’t really considered the logical conclusion of the ‘no consequence abortion’ position.

[PJBankard]

You do realize that the historical reason women weren’t prosecuted back than was to get convictions against the abortion providers. The women being considered a victim was a more compelling case. You do also realize that women were treated differently back then as well.

So considering current times, why are women the victims? Can they not think for themselves? Can they not make their own choices? Is their testimony the only way to get a conviction? Hasn’t technology and forensic science advance far enough?