I’m sorry but I don’t understand the comment. The whole pretense of the “argument” (the original post) was that in essence, Mr. Cruz supported abortion due to his comment that a woman who had an abortion should not be punished.
It was a “hit job” on Mr. Cruz.
It was not an argument pro or con about abortion or the implications of what should happen to a woman who has an abortion. If it was I would agree with you.
I was simply pointing out that both candidates held the same position as the poster in post 11.
So, because both candidates say the same thing means that “no consequence abortion” is not a fake pro-life position?
The hope of the pro-life position long has been a life amendment. How would you write it? “All life is protected except when taken by the mother before birth, provided no doctor is involved.” Is that what they’ve been dreaming of?