Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yoe

I’m just surprised its Arizona, unless they really like being close to a desert. There are plenty of places they could have chosen for hay fields I would think would be more productive though. As far as them owning the land, who cares? they can’t take it with them, they will still be subject to every law in the books, they will have to pay taxes, pay farmers to do the fieldwork, who the hell cares if they shelled out the bucks so that they have control over what is grown. They probably did it because of some stupid muslim ancient bylaw that forbids their cows from eating grass touched by an infidel or something. Or maybe they are tired of getting moldy hay that was crap and just wanted a good quality control. Land for sustenance I’m okay with, but things like infrastructure and cutting edge technology is where I want the line drawn at.


20 posted on 03/30/2016 12:40:11 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Abathar
Yeah, but they are exploiting our natural resources and sending the product to Saudi Arabia for their use. That would be a big no-no if a US company did that to a third world country. That would be just awful. The left would go apoplectic. College professors would crap in their diapers

We should tax the living daylights out of their little operation. Make them pay big.

50 posted on 03/30/2016 5:29:28 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson