Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Sanchez: #CruzSexScandal Takes Off As Senator Fails To Forcefully Deny Allegations
Fox News Latino ^ | Published March 28, 2016 | Rick Sanchez

Posted on 03/28/2016 5:34:04 PM PDT by drewh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: drewh; Pelham

She strikes a nice

Vuitton bag

Great legs per my taste

Pearls..,,I’ll avoid being tacky hat tip Billy Gibbons

Smokes....I married to a vape girl

I prefer hair down but I can see the allure toothy notwithstanding

I confessed I looked for knee burns lol and noticed three pin scars right knee cap

She may have had a halo brace there once?


41 posted on 03/28/2016 7:30:35 PM PDT by wardaddy (Cruz path to nomination is a box canyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; drewh

So basically we have a guy who grew up a nerdy church kid who didn’t hang out with babes in high school or college. He finds himself being pursued by a hottie of the sort that he only used to fantasize about. He knows what he ought to do, but good judgment is the first casualty...


42 posted on 03/28/2016 9:18:54 PM PDT by Pelham (A refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Nope. The burden of proof for slander of a public official requires "actual malice". Since the accusations are innuendo and reports that people are discussing the possibility that . . ., Cruz would probably lose even if the reports are provably total fabrications. He would have to prove that the reports were known to be false and that the motive was malice, not just negligence or a desire to sell papers. That is a very high standard.

He was asked point blank if he had ever been unfaithful to his wife. Carly stepped in to attack the reporter and Donald Trump. Cruz then attacked the reporter and Donald Trump. And he never answered the question. He's guilty and he knows there's evidence.

43 posted on 03/28/2016 9:23:25 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda; Jack Black
"Holy cow are those tweets for real, that is just WEIRD, and creepy"

Those are lyrics from the musical Grease...

44 posted on 03/28/2016 9:26:53 PM PDT by Pelham (A refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop
No, it isn't, because this is something a man should be proud of.

He could have easily said, I am only going to say this once' and then be done with it.

Any faithful man would have answered the question immediately.

45 posted on 03/29/2016 12:16:02 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt
Trump has nothing to do with this!

Stop repeating the lie!

46 posted on 03/29/2016 12:17:38 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Yes, for a married man, totally inappropriate!


47 posted on 03/29/2016 12:18:44 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

If the tweets are real.


48 posted on 03/29/2016 12:21:21 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

“No, it isn’t, because this is something a man should be proud of.
He could have easily said, I am only going to say this once’ and then be done with it.

Any faithful man would have answered the question immediately.”

So you would have him say “I am only going to say this once: I have stopped beating my wife”.

Do you see how stupid that sounds?

And why by the way should anyone respond ‘immediately’ to any type of trash that is thrown out in public?

Put yourself in his shoes. Would you respond to a really good journalistic magazine’s article like the National Enquirer that ran an article that you were cheating on your wife?

Ignore the idiocy.


49 posted on 03/29/2016 7:53:45 AM PDT by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; Sarah Barracuda

Fox hired this jerk? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.


50 posted on 03/29/2016 12:09:11 PM PDT by Impy (Did you know "Hillary" spelled backwards is "Bitch"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop
No, the stop beating the wife' argument doesn't wash because Cruz had already made an issue of the charges.

A simple question is asked and all Cruz had to say is simply 'no I never was unfaithful to my wife'.

51 posted on 03/29/2016 12:30:00 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I haven’t even seen the drunken killer on Fox, when the heck did they hire him?


52 posted on 03/29/2016 12:45:20 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I didn’t mean they put him on tv (no idea if they have), he wrote this article for “Fox News Latino”, it says he is a “contributor”.


53 posted on 03/29/2016 12:59:17 PM PDT by Impy (Did you know "Hillary" spelled backwards is "Bitch"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Oh Im sorry my mistake


54 posted on 03/29/2016 1:06:39 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

NO ONE should be answering a question posed by a trashy mag.

It is still the same situation, and I would not give any innuendo like that the time of day.

This is all a setup trying to convince voters to feat Cruz will go down.

I know Ted personally.

He is genuine.


55 posted on 03/29/2016 4:52:08 PM PDT by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson