Has there been a single reported “fact” about this “scandal”? None. The NE is looking into rumors. The Washington Times guy says that “From what I know, at least 2 of the women named as Cruz mistresses by the National Enquirer are accurate”. What does that mean? Accurate that they had affairs with Cruz? Accurate that they exist? Accurate that they are 2 of the people NE is reporting about? “From what I know”? What does he know? What information does he draw on to confirm whatever he’s supposedly confirming? How is his information verified?
The Cruz ‘scandal’ is completely phony. No facts. No evidence. No proof. No testimony. No documentation. Nothing.
++++
A Lover’s Sister-in-Law Speaks Out:
This week the National Enquirer (which first reported the affair of failed Democrat party member John Edwards) broke a story that alleges Ted Cruz had multiple affairs with various women, while his wife Heidi Cruz was battling depression.
The Cruz campaign has yet to respond to the allegations, but a short phone call with the sister in-law of one of the women, after I found her online through use of the White Pages, appears to confirm the allegations. The woman, whose brother is married to the alleged paramour — who appears on CNN as contributor, said, “It’s true. They were together only a few times.”
She added her sister-in-law, “was transfixed by Ted. He has a way of selling ice to an Eskimo.”
I asked when the affairs occurred. “Right before Ted’s campaign for Senate,” she said. “They’d get together when Cruz visited DC.” She added, “The whole family knows, everybody knows about this.”
Cruz’s lover is married and has children.
https://medium.com/@Blackppl4Trump/l-affaire-of-ted-cruz-c1818b9db18f#.fqh8co47b
There were Carson rumors, too, spread in part by certain Trumpsters here. Brain sponges, cultism, pyramid schemes. Now? All gone! Immaculated! Gossip-mill re-directed to new boogieman.
Liberals don't need proof to push a meme.....and now, it seems, neither do "supposed" Conservatives.