>> Wheres the call for retraction of Ill sue? ... then why lawyer up? <<
Uh... to sue?
The problem is that the article is so vague, it’s hard to sue. When you name sources, all you have to do is get the source to deny or sue the source. But Nat Ex didn’t name any sources, other than Stone’s “analysis.” So the lawyers have to break the stonewall.
If ever there was a case of Defamation of Character, this is it, but Cruz won’t sue, wouldn’t want pesky depositions under oath.
Shhhh ...just relax ...the truth will out ...
http://www.youngcons.com/hacker-group-anonymous-threatens-to-release-info-on-ted-cruzs-mistresses/