Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doldrumsforgop
I think our terminology may be cross-wise. You are correct that ROI on earlier capital expenditure are greater due to lower initial capital costs., but I still stand by an API report (I'll keep looking for it) that stated that the overall shale breakeven point for a "project" in it's entire life is $50-$80 / bbl range.

Furthermore, even though the initial capital costs may be less, the yields reduce as the field ages. So it may be a closer wash more than you are stating.

154 posted on 03/26/2016 7:51:26 PM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: catfish1957

“I think our terminology may be cross-wise. You are correct that ROI on earlier capital expenditure are greater due to lower initial capital costs., but I still stand by an API report (I’ll keep looking for it) that stated that the overall shale breakeven point for a “project” in it’s entire life is $50-$80 / bbl range.
Furthermore, even though the initial capital costs may be less, the yields reduce as the field ages. So it may be a closer wash more than you are stating.

I do not know how to make this more clear to you:

Capital costs following the initial drilling and completion of a well are negligible.

Any API report you might find is likely to be for a new capital project(read drilling new wells), which will have a higher crude price threshold for BE economics than the current oil price.

This is not rocket science, but old-fashioned oilpatch economics.


169 posted on 03/27/2016 6:22:11 AM PDT by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson