Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest

Moreover the other people implicated would have an action. N0 one threatening to sue. Speaks volumes.


235 posted on 03/26/2016 5:16:11 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (GOP delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: RKBA Democrat

Moreover the other people implicated would have an action. N0 one threatening to sue. Speaks volumes.


And that right there is KEY.


239 posted on 03/26/2016 5:17:04 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: RKBA Democrat

You might want to look into the slander and libelous laws as it applies to public figures, specifically the malice requirement. And then read the NE article chock full of weasel words rescuing them from a lawsuit.


244 posted on 03/26/2016 5:19:46 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: RKBA Democrat

There are no people implicated and the speculation by the rumor mongers thus far would indicate that those speculated about are thus far each and every one a public figure. A bit to tidy there.


249 posted on 03/26/2016 5:22:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson