What you say is true. It would cause someone to hide the evidence.
But like the prosecution of Hillary, there needs to be a showing of that evidence.
I know in politics, people draw inferences and don’t wait for the evidence like in a court of law. But people’s lives are at stake here, and I think that if we are going to spread potentially slanderous statements about anyone, public figure or not, we need to treat everyone as though it was a family member.
I don’t think Cruz controlled that PAC, because look at the shit storm it has brought down upon him. I also don’t think Trump put National Enquirer up to it either.
But either could be true.
We need to allow cooler heads to prevail.
This hurts us all.
But like the prosecution of Hillary, there needs to be a showing of that evidence.
I know in politics, people draw inferences and don’t wait for the evidence like in a court of law. But people’s lives are at stake here, and I think that if we are going to spread potentially slanderous statements about anyone, public figure or not, we need to treat everyone as though it was a family member.
I don’t think Cruz controlled that PAC, because look at the shit storm it has brought down upon him. I also don’t think Trump put National Enquirer up to it either.
But either could be true.
We need to allow cooler heads to prevail.
This hurts us all.
If you could take 2 min and watch this vid from the Cavuto show, I would like to know what you think about it. It is Andrea Mcwilliams, a big time Cruz supporter and big time Austin lobbyist. This was on March 8th, and I believe she was telegraphing to any PACs supporting Cruz's run, that they needed to focus on Melania. She is very very clear about that, almost startlingly so ... It gets Cruz through all the legal hoops and gets the campaign's desires out there ... This is one of the ways they do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALErcfr7jQ0&feature=youtu.be&t=4m