To: Safetgiver; jmacusa
The USA, Germany, and Britain were signatories of a number of treaties and conventions that regulate proper behavior in an armed conflict. Deliberately attacking civilians was wrong for the Germans to do, and also wrong for the Allies to do.
The best that is sometimes said about all these bombings on both sides is that they were technically legitimate at the time, but the Geneva Convention of 1949 condemns it. An of course look at it as you may, there were massive avoidable civilian casualties.
34 posted on
03/25/2016 5:44:33 PM PDT by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: annalex
There is no such thing as ‘’avoidable’’ civilian causalities in war going back thousands of years. All those murdered in the Holocaust, were they avoidable? The Germans made the rules and the rules were everything and everyone is a target. Toatalerkreig said Goebbels , in German that means ‘’total war. War isn't a game of cricket. It's a slaughter of humanity at every level.
38 posted on
03/26/2016 10:07:26 AM PDT by
jmacusa
("Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more!''-- Popeye The Sailorman.)
To: annalex
The Germans sure lost their thirst for war though didn’t they.
A far cry from the end of WWI when they were convinced they only lost because they were “stabbed in the back.”
42 posted on
03/27/2016 7:21:24 PM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson