Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safetgiver; jmacusa

The USA, Germany, and Britain were signatories of a number of treaties and conventions that regulate proper behavior in an armed conflict. Deliberately attacking civilians was wrong for the Germans to do, and also wrong for the Allies to do.

The best that is sometimes said about all these bombings on both sides is that they were technically legitimate at the time, but the Geneva Convention of 1949 condemns it. An of course look at it as you may, there were massive avoidable civilian casualties.


34 posted on 03/25/2016 5:44:33 PM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
There is no such thing as ‘’avoidable’’ civilian causalities in war going back thousands of years. All those murdered in the Holocaust, were they avoidable? The Germans made the rules and the rules were everything and everyone is a target. Toatalerkreig said Goebbels , in German that means ‘’total war. War isn't a game of cricket. It's a slaughter of humanity at every level.
38 posted on 03/26/2016 10:07:26 AM PDT by jmacusa ("Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more!''-- Popeye The Sailorman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: annalex

The Germans sure lost their thirst for war though didn’t they.

A far cry from the end of WWI when they were convinced they only lost because they were “stabbed in the back.”


42 posted on 03/27/2016 7:21:24 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson