Lets agree to disagree then for I have no wish to be disagreeable.
I did see your video segment. Its part of my point. That is the first time Cruz disavowed and it was past due. I think if you take a gander at this short video clip about 4 minutes in you will begin to see that there is very little about this that Ted Cruz was not aware of before the ad came out. https://youtu.be/ALErcfr7jQ0
If you look through my far too numerous posts you will not find any liberal gymnastics. I started out as I ended believing that Cruz chose to benefit from shady tactics by using plausible deniability and got his ticket punched. He could have taken the high road as Trump did when Ted’s girls were attacked but he didn’t.
I am having a bit of difficulty with Ted’s defenders today because they are really stretching common sense and common decency. Trump had no trouble defending Ted’s girls http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/23/donald-trump-blasts-nasty-washington-post-ted-cruz-cartoon/
But Ted chose to sneer and step aside.
A "supporter".........not a member of Cruz's campaign....talks about Trump's wife. Guess what? So did CNN anchor Ashleigh Banfield and quite a few others in the same time period after the GQ story came out with all the the skin pictures. Do they ALL work for Cruz....including GQ?
And the link to Trump's defense of Cruz's girls? He said "bad". So now the word "bad" is the "high road" but Cruz calling the Melania ad "totally inappropriate" is not? Also, you might want to look at the fact that the article/cartoon was printed on the 22nd and Trump didn't say "bad" til the 23rd....so how does that fit into your "time rating" of when a disavowing statement is "real" or not? Good grief.....
By the way, talking about "stretching common decency"......I've noticed quite a few threads posted by Trump supporters being pulled on FR today pushing a National Enquirer story about Cruz screwing around on his wife. Trump's water boy, Sundance, who we see posted here "ad nauseam" is working to lead the charge.
Following the Trump supporters "thinking" about the Melania ad.....I guess it's fair to start saying that Trump is behind these filthy stories, right? Wasn't it just yesterday that Trump promised to "spill the beans" which proves he gave the story to the National Enquirer?
Lets agree to disagree then for I have no wish to be disagreeable.
Well, I'm not "trying" to be disagreeable with you....I'm just pretty pissed off about this BS.
We have people who want to blow us up or cut off our heads and the two idiots at the "top" of the Republican primary (and their supporters) are rolling around in the mud while the Hildebeast gets ready to prance through the White House door.
Heck, after today....I'm fine and dandy with the GOPe putting in someone else at the Convention to run in the Presidential General election since I think even "Bawling Boehner" would beat Hillary easier than Trump and Cruz would now.