this was a test for the “at the timed of ratification” line
Whose test?
The lefties have always trotted out the muzzle-loading flintlock musket thing as what the framer’s intent was regards to firearms and the firearms covered by their intent.
So this idiot judge throws that line into his opinion and figures that if it was upheld, then he will have put into precedent the concept of the firearms available in 1787.