If he's not implying that then why drag Donald Trump into it? Look, here it is again:
Well, I will say, it is striking that the day after Donald Trump called for America weakening NATO withdrawing from NATO we see Brussels, where NATO is headquartered, the subject of a radical Islamist terrorist attack. Donald Trump is wrong that America should withdraw from the world and abandon our allies. Donald Trump is wrong that America should retreat from Europe, retreat from NATO, hand Putin a major victory and while hes at it, hand ISIS a major victory.
He manages to not only imply but find a way to weasel word it to make it look like it's Trump fault. If you can't deal with your can with your candidates propensity to blame Trump for every bad thing in the world then I can't help you. Cruz, like it or not, is a slime bucket who will stoop to anything to gain political points.
Cruz was laying out a policy difference - Trump is an isolationist, Cruz is not. Trump laid out his isolationist stance just yesterday at a Washington Post roundtable.
If you can't deal with your can [sic] with your candidates propensity to blame Trump ...
If you can't understand Cruz was not blaming Trump, but was highlighting a policy difference, you're highlighting the lack of intellectual rigor so many conservatives here and elsewhere have lamented among the Trump crowd. You are FEELING, not THINKING, and that's no way to make a rational decision.
And again, I'm actually sympathetic to Trump's position! But you and your comrades aren't doing Trump any favors when you post utter bull$#!^ accusing Cruz of blaming Trump for something when Cruz clearly didn't.