Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dschapin

Maybe in the Western states, but in the Northeast, Kasich is more of a real threat to Trump than Cruz. Kasich will limit the number of delegates Trump would otherwise pick up in states like PA, CT, RI, and perhaps even NY (none of which are winner-take-all).


37 posted on 03/21/2016 11:39:05 AM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FenwickBabbitt

Kasich should be limiting his campaigning to those NE liberal states and not campaigning in the West where he is running a very distant third. Similarily, Cruz should not campaign in the liberal NE states where he runs a distant third. That is the way to deny Trump enough delegates and force a contested convention. I am not sure why all the candidates are unwilling to coordinate and win.


42 posted on 03/21/2016 11:45:42 AM PDT by dschapin (sur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: FenwickBabbitt
"Kasich will limit the number of delegates Trump would otherwise pick up in states like PA, CT, RI, and perhaps even NY (none of which are winner-take-all)."

How? He's unknown outside Ohio, he's already ran for shit in not one but two bordering states (3rd in Michigan, 4th in Kentucky, and not carrying a single county in either one), and he has no money. He won't break 10% anywhere up East.

67 posted on 03/21/2016 12:18:43 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (#Getbackinthebackoftheshortbus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson