Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/18/2016 7:35:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

5,000 feet? That must be a very high end drone.


2 posted on 03/18/2016 7:38:54 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Ut us inexcusable that people would fly a drone near airports and at altitudes where they endanger airplanes.


3 posted on 03/18/2016 7:39:54 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Here’s a phrase that apparently the airlines simply made up: near miss. They say that if 2 planes almost collide, it’s a near miss. Bullsh__, my friend. It’s a near hit! A collision is a near miss.
[WHAM! CRUNCH!]
“Look, they nearly missed!”
“Yes, but not quite.”

-George Carlin


6 posted on 03/18/2016 7:45:06 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
"... at an altitude of 5,000 feet (152 metres)..."

Error in original article. 152 meters= ~500 feet.

7 posted on 03/18/2016 7:45:26 PM PDT by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

14 miles @ 300 ft/mile for a 3 degree glideslope = 4200 feet, plus about 200 feet (above the jet, per the reports) = about 4400 feet for the drone at the time of the incident.

It was probably one of the heavier drones, with bigger batteries and cameras, since the smaller ones can’t get that high (and the operator would lose sight of a smaller one at that altitude).

Put it this way: the drones that have that kind of capability have more mass than a goose, and at 200 knots closure (likely the slowest the A380 was traveling) it could do a lot of damage, considering it’s not composed of skin, bone, and feathers, but rather dense metal in its motors, batteries, and cameras.


11 posted on 03/18/2016 7:54:34 PM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
No evasive action was taken by the airline crew, and the plane, Lufthansa Flight 456, safely made its landing minutes later without further incident, according to FAA spokesman Ian Gregor.

They didn't see it until it was too late for evasive action. If they had been on a collision path, they likely would have collided even with a few seconds notice, because the A380 is not very maneuverable at that configuration and speed, and was on autopilot (slows the response from the pilot unless the autopilot is disconnected).

13 posted on 03/18/2016 8:02:07 PM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Thank you for flying Lufthansa...

(Very old punchline to a very old joke.)


14 posted on 03/18/2016 9:16:06 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
These "drones" are probably the little 4-prop jobs.
I'll bet several have already collided with jets and the pilots never knew,
20 posted on 03/19/2016 4:55:04 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (Go Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson