[Ajnin]

Yeah, being a Constitutional scholar is now considered looney tunes...huh?

[showme_the_Glory]

What one knows is not necessarily equal to what they speak. Cheerleading for Ted doesn’t require a degree in anything.

[Veracious Poet]

Yeah, being a Constitutional scholar is now considered looney tunes...huh?

Apparently, but you can't really be a Constitutional scholar if you're completely ignorant and/or repulsed by the law underlying:

The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions. ~ John Locke 1690

And I've never heard The Great One even hint towards an understanding and/or an awareness of Locke, not to mention Natural Law...

[o2bfree]

Yeah, being a Constitutional scholar is now considered looney tunes...huh?

If defeating progressivism, open borders, and unfair trade deals is not acceptable to Levin and Beck , then the answer is yes.

Mark Levin and Glenn Beck have become an embarrassing mishmash of constitutional jargon. Not one bit of Levin makes any sense.

Count me as a former listener of both of these Turds..