Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CA Conservative; Albion Wilde; PJBankard
It is true that you technically don't have to be a judge, or even a lawyer to be on the Supreme Court, the reality is you do have to be a judge with certain credentials.

No one without judicial experience would be nominated, and certainly not confirmed. Especially with the politicization of today. Not having the right judicial experience would be an easy grounds to knock out a nominee.

Besides which, such a nominee, even if confirmed, would not be able to have the right kind of influence on the court.

Maybe if he had chose a different path in life, Cruz could be on the Supreme Court. But, as it stands now, he would not be a good Supreme Court Justice. He might make a good, president, senator, governor, or congressman, but not that.

376 posted on 03/16/2016 6:35:08 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Cruz’s career is of a Constitutional Lawyer. If you didn’t intend to go to the SCOTUS if the option became available, why did you choose that career path. I can understand being in the Judiciary or Legislature (Senate or HoR) with a Constitutional Law background, but not the Executive Branch.


383 posted on 03/16/2016 6:45:04 PM PDT by PJBankard (I wouldn't let Obama or Hillary run my Dairy Queen - Wayne Allen Root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson