2) Next, you would have to back up your charges by making the case that the actions of Trump today and Frankel in 2004 are comparable. Since Frankel bodily attacked a heckler that had not physically threatened or attacked anyone and Trump only advocated physical responses to the threats & physical attacks of hecklers - while never bodily attacking anyone himself - you will only fail on that count.
3) Even if the above facts were not the facts (supposing you did not fail on point 1 & 2) you would still fail to discredit the fundamental point of the thread: That Trump is a victim of a ruling-elite double-standard that gave Frankel a complete pass on his actions in 2004 and widely and loudly condemned Trump for his actions today. And that is true whatever a FReeper believes the correct standard for handling hecklers and violent/threatening protesters at campaign rallies should be - and whatever your opinion of Trump is.
Every single point you raised to draw distinctions between how FR reacted to the two incidents applies to the media as well.