Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

No need to disavow anything. The guy that did it will pay.

No candidate can control everyone at an event. Especially large events.

The thug who showed up to disrupt deserves whatever he got.

He would have been wise to take personal responsibility for what happened to himself in the pursuit of doing the wrong thing.

The disruptor incited the 78 year old man to act and he got wht he asked for.

End of story.


114 posted on 03/15/2016 7:01:51 AM PDT by dforest (Ted took your money and is laughing all the way to Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: dforest

Yes there is a need to disavow the actions of criminals. Trump did not do so and further, crossed over the line is support of a criminal. That encourages the exact type of behavior that should not be encouraged.

Yes, the protester showed up to disrupt the even and was being escorted out as he was trespassing at that point in time. That was the proper thing to do. He did NOT deserve to be viciously assaulted. That is why the 78 year old Trump supporter has been charged with the violent attack.

Trump would have been wiser to express to the audience that he understood their frustration but he needed them in the voting both, not in jail. So let the police and security handle the protesters.

The 78 year old BOY could not control himself like a little child.

end of story


115 posted on 03/15/2016 7:14:49 AM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson